You are currently browsing the tag archive for the 'Jerry Garcia' tag.

Coming to grips with the decline of Mr. Garcia post-70s, much in the vocal department is a depressing side road for me.  Maybe because, as I tout so openly, I am middle-aged.

The 1984/85 New Year’s Eve performance of Shakedown Street, a song I always liked on the radio, on the So Many Roads collection, has to contain the worst vocal performance of a lead vocalist on any officially released album ever.

Jerry, by my calculation, was 42 or 43.

Now, maybe that night he was famous for having a cold or something, but come on.  The Scarlet Begonias from Hamilton, Ontario, 1990, a few tracks later on So Many Roads isn’t much better.

Then I get to Terrapin Station, 9/12/1991 a couple more tracks in, and I find myself moved.  Before I have a chance to read the date, the melody grabs me as it always does and immediately I find myself in another state of mind.  Then the singing.

I am listening to a dying man.  Easy to say now, but he didn’t die for another four years.

Yet he’s dying there.  No man who wasn’t dying would be allowed to sing in that vocal state – he’d hurt his vocal cords and do permanent damage.  Only a man with no future would have been permitted to push himself like that.

I cannot get beyond the line “I will not forgive you”, although I know its a trick played by retrospect.

Then, later “The storyteller makes no choice, soon you will not hear his voice . . . “

If you have any love for what Jerry Garcia created, or for the man, take a listen to this vocally painful version if you haven’t in a while.

All but despondent, I then stumble upon Whiskey in the Jar, a gem in so many ways.  If the chatter mid-rehearsal in 1993 is to be taken at face value, Garcia begins playing this old Irish folk tune from deep memory, then singing along.  If  I had any doubt that Garcia’s first love was bluegrass and that he was a genius, it is dissolved here.

His banter with Bob Weir about the song and its lyrics captures what so many have written about him — he is enraptured by the music, a bit of a wise guy in the process — “I haven’t [heard it in 30 years] either, I just remembered it” he responds to Bobby, with either a bit of prodding one-upsmanship in his voice or maybe he’s just on something.

When he says “great lyrics, it’s a cool song” he sounds like a teenager.

He would later, some research reveals, record the song with David Grisman later that year — adding another must-hear to my long list.

So Many Roads, performed with the Grateful Dead that final show in Chicago in 1995, closes the CD.  I recognize that there are a lot of interesting coincidences and foreshadowings going on, and as a novice I will not attempt to put it all together.

I will simply note that I have read Garcia idolized Dylan, and that the ending background vocals are quite reminiscent of Knocking on Heaven’s Door.  That The Well has some really great message board threads organized by song, and that I read somewhere that Robert Hunter sometimes wrote lyrics for Garcia to serve as a message to Garcia.

And that there are many oblique references to other Dead-repertoire songs in the lyrics to So Many Roads.

My favorite is the one I caught on my own, the first line:  “Thought I heard a blackbird singing”, reminding me of Morning Dew.

Dear Dead Diary:

So I’ve taken a little break from posting.  It doesn’t mean I haven’t listened to the Grateful Dead non-stop since my last post.

I just needed some time to consolidate my thinking.

I’m sure I’ll drop my standards soon, but it will be fun someday to look back and see my earlier, obviously wrongheaded views in print.

So here goes.

First, this band played way too many shows of much too long a duration for way too many years.

Second, this band and its fans enthusiastically killed the golden goose.

Third, the golden goose had his own issues that led him to prefer working himself to death (by playing music) rather than doing something else.

Fourth, something happened to Jerry’s voice somewhere between 1978 and 1981, I haven’t worked through that era yet, but his vocals pre- and post- that event, whatever it was, are completely obvious within 5 seconds of listening.

Fifth, starting in the eighties, the crowd sounds more like a typical rock crowd, in terms of the intensity of the cheering, you can hear the hero worship and stridency (it happened across many bands, if not all of them).  It’s pretty stunningly obvious after having listened to a couple of months of 70s shows exclusively.

I could go on, Dear Diary, but there’s the gist of it.

My basis for being a curmudgeon is all right there.  But at least no one can say I only like the era I recall from my youth, or of the shows I attended, or the music that accompanied my young romances, because there was no Grateful Dead for me in any of those years.  Well, almost none.

I have probably listened to only 20 songs where Brent sings, thus far.  I recall that the Eighties were keyboard-centric, and hated them contemporaneously as well as ever since.

It is not a good sign that I don’t like Mr. Mydland’s singing at all.  Very Eighties, over-singing without a good voice drives me nuts.  And the Dead’s originals from that era are too keyboard-driven for me.

So I’m worrying here a bit, although it would be a relief not to have so much to wade through in such detail.

I think the path here is to stay focused on the Seventies for now, with brief forays into the late 60s and the Pigpen era for some relief.

I’m listening to Hey Pocky Way, whatever that is, from So Many Roads, if that helps explain anything . . .

A surprising element of learning more about how the Grateful Dead wrote its original material regards the authority of their voice — or in their case, their multiple lead-singing vocalists.

Other than the Allman Brothers, I can’t think of an important rock band that split its lead vocal duties as evenly between two major players as did the Dead.

Nonetheless, to the tourist-level fan, there is no doubt that the voice of Jerry Garcia represents the vocal “signature” of the Grateful Dead.  His particular thin, straining, quavering high voice paradoxically spoke with an authority that a better, stronger, more typical rock front-man’s voice would not have.

A cross between mystical, all-wise guru and wiseguy “head”, Garcia’s pronouncements gained by their utterly authentic delivery via his “flawed” vocals.  (I already know “we” Deadheads wouldn’t change a thing, at least until the 80s).

So it is a point of inquiry for me that the original words he sung were not usually of his own creation, but of Robert Hunter or other collaborators.

Now, I’m not saying he was just a lyric reader.  Surely he and Hunter worked in a collaboration that, at least in myth, was simultaneous and inseparable.  Surely we can hear the sentiments of a Hunter lyric and assume that he was writing along the lines ol’ Jer had inspired.

In truth, Garcia probably was more of an editor, in selecting what songs to put to his music, how to arrange them and which lyrics to keep and which to throw out, or modify.

The musical contribution alone stands as a towering achievement on so many classic tunes.

In some ways, Garcia’s interpretation of Hunter’s words might make the lyrics even more meaningful than if Garcia had penned them himself.  Few bands worked with such talented and numerous off-site lyricists while writing their own music.

It’s an odd formula but one that created catch-phrases that may have never lived had the band wrote more of its own lyric material.  “One man gathers what another man spills.”

Somehow, it may have been easier for Hunter to come up with those gems when he was not standing on stage so many hundreds of nights, watching how the audience reacted to them.  Being closer to the reaction may have impeded his creativity.

On another day, I will consider the impact of the unusual songwriting tandems of Garcia-Hunter and Weir-Barlow, and how competition may have served the fans and band favorably, without the typical rancor seen in so many other outfits in the rock era.  Right now, it’s a puzzlement to me, on a human level, as to how it stayed together and positive.

Boy, if there was to be but one example of Grateful Dead hype and excess, it would have to be “Terrapin”.  As a bystander, I have heard about potential Dead theme destinations to be named Terrapin Station, after the album and song of the same name, some kind of mythical place where turtles dance and gothic soldiers march . . .

A new live CD release titled “To Terrapin”, give me a break, I have thought.  Does every Dead catchword have to become a marketing ploy?  Is there nothing these fans won’t swallow?

Well, now I’ve heard Terrapin Station a few times in a few versions.  Jerry vocally channels Robert Plant in the talk-singing part of Kashmir, then the band does that little Pink Floyd-y bridge for the lyrics

Since the end is never told
we pay the teller off in gold
in hopes he will come back
but he cannot be bought or sold

Then Donna nails it perfectly:  “Terrapin!  Terrapin!” she wails with unyielding purpose and a strong vibrato.  And I mean wails in the best sense.

Wow, I can hear the crowd scream all the way through the onstage vocal mics on my soundboard recording, and for the first time other than for a Garcia guitar solo, I can imagine myself there, leaping and screaming myself.

I’m not easily wrapped up in exotic tales of make believe, and Hunter’s lyrics strike me as trying a bit too hard, but Jerry’s music would work as an instrumental just as well.  Well, you do need to shout “Terrapin” a few times,  but this majestic work is the opposite of the shambolic boogies I first fell in love with a few weeks ago . . . .

Thanks to a reader for the tip — the entire Winterland show of 6-9-1977 is rich and resonant and I am just scratching the surface.  Garcia turns in another screaming solo with piercing tone on Loser, and he plays with volume, command and fluidity throughout.  Take a listen.

If you know anything about The Grateful Dead, you know this:  don’t bother with the studio albums.  Live shows are where the action is.

It’s true, because missing out on the mountain of live performance would be an absolute sin.

But, with perfect Dead-like ambivalence, it’s also false.

In trying to absorb the live Dead musical canon, my efforts to date (described below in prior posts) have by necessity focused on several years at a time.  How else do you digest 30 years and 3000+shows?

I finally helped myself out by violating the above truth — I went to the studio albums as a break from a dizzying array of live shows separated mostly by city names and dates in the form 19xx-xx-xx.

By working through the Dead’s studio output, you learn some interesting things (such as when a song generally first appeared chronologically), get to see who wrote it, whether it’s an original or a cover, hear who sung on the studio version and what “voice” they used (Jerry’s singing style has varied from time to time) and finally, and most importantly, you may hear a different arrangement — usually more complex, with some instruments you won’t necessarily hear live,  and with multi-tracked guitar lines.  More Garcia is always a good thing, and the intertwined lead playing is often sublime.  And there is more acoustic playing than in the live versions, providing some differences in dynamics.

A bonus is the newer CDs contain bonus tracks, often outtakes or alternate versions, along with some seminal live versions.

The original fans of the band did not have such easy access to the recorded live shows, and they certainly listened to these LPs repeatedly to a point where track order became second-nature and the music became a soundtrack to lives.

If nothing else, you recognize that a heck of a lot changed in the world between 1968 and 1974.

These records stand up to the test of time.  Oddly, the oldest more psychedelic ones don’t sound old or dated to me at all (the 80s and 90s one do somewhat).  With the occasional use of the skip button (e.g., for What’s Become of the Baby on Aoxomoxoa), you are left with one of the most underrated career outputs of any rock band, especially among American bands.

And, by the way, Friend of the Devil, from American Beauty, ought to be shot into space to represent the first two hundred years of what we, as a society, used to be able to agree was the American spirit.

The first law of the Grateful Dead is that the studio albums are not where the action is.

But I just went searching for the Grateful Dead albums that my buddy D might have been playing in his car back in high school. Live tapes hadn’t made it to our neck of the woods yet (clueless high schoolers) in those days.

So, Aoxomoxoa.

A few things shot to mind.  The guitar playing on St. Stephen is sublime.  Dupree’s is a McCartney knockoff, no?  And Rosemary — ah, Rosemary.  Haven’t heard that tune since “back in the day.”

Doin’ That Rag — wow, chills of memory and delight from the gorgeous melody.  And more McCartney/Beatles influence.

The leads on China Cat, what fluidity from Jerry.  Those were the days for liquid leads, weren’t they — Duane Allman, Dickey Betts, Mick Taylor, etc.

Some reading indicates this is considered the Dead’s “experimental” period.  As someone who was there listening to music in the early 70s and on, this music doesn’t sound that experimental to me.

Many bands’ entire works tread the ground that Aoxomoxoa treads.  Aoxomoxoa is just better than most.  I wonder what would have happened if Garcia kept going down that path more consistently?

Also, doesn’t Jerry’s creativity completely dominate this album?

Dust off Aoxomoxoa if you haven’t for a while.

One of the detriments of reading so much interesting writing about the Grateful Dead (and the fan experience in particular) available online is that it accelerates the development of and maybe even pollutes the purity of my own thoughts as I experience this trip into the music.

I am not a neophyte as far as rock music, fandom or even Internet writing/community go, so while I may be relatively fresh to the music of the Dead, I am not at all fresh to the patterns that have evolved around how popular music works its way into society.

At my dedicated observer’s post, it is my duty to try to record thoughts that might have fleetingly passed through more experienced folks’ minds long ago.  I fully expect most readers who have already been there to think “ah, yes, I remember thinking that way for all of ten minutes, a long, long time ago.”

One salient observation, I hope, is that I am already feeling an internal censorious voice warning me to avoid blundering into giving offense to the fan base.  I didn’t feel it earlier, when I was clearly in that taking off the wrapping paper and opening the box mode, becuase I knew I would be forgiven.

Now that I’m into it a bit, however, certain sensibilities have crept into my thinking and I am worried about violating the social norms of Grateful Dead observation and critique.

Please note — it’s not a result of any unkind comment or response from a reader, although I am sure those will someday come (if they didn’t I’d be disappointed with my lack of trenchant observations).

Simply put, I sometimes wonder whether folks writing about the Dead have completely foresworn their involvement with other music such that they think the Dead invented everything they are doing.

My favorite example might be references to Playing in the Band, aka Playing, Playin’, or PITB.

A reader unfamiliar with the GD might read something and think that Playing will just knock their socks off.  The references to the song, and the almost always accompanying jam therein, are rendered in a shorthand that lend huge weight and import to the song.

A newbie listening to nearly any version of PITB would hear a singer, Mr. Weir, laconically and somewhat disinterestedly (and sometimes a little off-key) , talk-singing through some pretty pedestrian insights about what it means to be part of a collective enterprise (like playing in a band, or life in general).

Musically, it would be hard to describe accurately, other than to say it’s pretty melodically uninteresting, although I did come across a reference to Creedence perhaps liking the beat (I think it’s the opposite, that Creedence would do a pretty nice job upgrading it into something more memorable).

The song is more of a vehicle for setting a mood of modest introspection, and for some improvisation (funny, but the improvisation on PITB strikes me as quite formulaic as far as Dead improvisation goes).

As an outsider, one might look at Playing and say it’s a pretty big chunk of time to spend going nowhere in particular.  Dare I say filler?

But filler is not a concept that seems to exist in Grateful Dead fandom.  It seems to go against the creed to even presume that every note is not dealt by the gods themselves, on a path seeking the ultimate transcendence, if not ultimately achieving it in all cases.

The Dead have written songs of exquisite beauty and originality, and have unearthed and popularized American traditionals of equal import.  Surely they know (knew) that some of their repertoire was not to that level.

I have come to think that the choice of droning tunes, extended by jams, is a conscious one.  At some point, the uninteresting becomes interesting, the boring becomes fascinating, it reduces the scale of what it takes to create an interesting counterpoint.  The less you are doing musically the less you need to do to create an exciting moment.

I feel the same way about El Paso, a tune that Weir seems to race through with a combination of compulsive love and complete boredom.

The El Paso jams are way more interesting than the Marty Robbins song itself, a way station to get past before the fun begins.  Fun being a relative term.  Although you will see El Paso on a lot of set lists, impassioned analyses of the jams are a little more rare.

Other bands — remember those — have their own standard tunes that they play most of their shows in a given era, and you don’t see reverence for those particular live performances among their fans.

The Rolling Stones might have played Rocks Off and Bitch every night of their 1972 U.S. tour, but the avid tape collectors aren’t discussing any of those particular performances.  The songs were played to represent major album tracks from recent LPs, but were not intended to, nor were they played, in a way to do more than merely mark time in the show.

So, we have one observation regarding the Dead here — that there is frequently seen a reverence for every note that simply does not pertain to other bands.

When reading online commentary, it can sometimes appear that the Dead invented everything for the first time.  Coming into this late, as I am, I have already had exposure to free form jazz, bebop, post-bop etc.  The idea of the musicians playing off each others’ ideas is not very revolutionary, and it doesn’t need much pointing out that the jazz guys were doing that way before the GD came along.

I’m not saying that other major rock bands incorporated as much jamming as did the Dead, but I do think they band gets too much credit for playing a nice jam.

I have had the pleasure of speaking to musicians who regularly improvise, some who have improvised at, let’s say, a very high level, given who they played as a part of, and very few consider the gift of transcendent improvisation to be one of conscious thought as much as being the result of good musical chops and doing what the fingers are practiced to do.

Truth be told, an unspeakably sad guitar solo for the ages in a song about sadness may have nothing to do with sadness in the mind of the guitarist.  He may be thinking of the post-gig sandwich while playing the in-scale notes that are available to him from the part of the fretboard his hand happens to be sitting at.  (At least that’s what I have been told.  That kind of ruins it for me).

To be clear, a good jam is a good jam, and a great one may be great.  But it’s not a miracle.  And it’s not even that unlikely if you played 3000 3-hour shows, that’s 9000 hours of music to make some noteworthy things happen.

And even when things are good, it needs to be recognized that there are lots of bands that have rocked, rolled, inspired, educated, and moved us over the years.  So much of the fan’s view is a function of the definition established by the band-fan relationship.

Patti Smith, say, expands the rock and punk idioms into that of the beat poet.  Her fans have their minds blown by being exposed to poetry and art in that context of rock music.  I daresay that there are fewer poetry fans getting their minds blown by the rock music accompanying her poetic instincts.  She’s moving people largely in one direction.

Implied in that is that in my example, Patti Smith fans are probably not experts in poetry when they first get started.  The poetry they hear from Smith garners the benefit of their excitement for the new medium (poetry) in general, rather than because it is necessarily the most outstanding or notable poetry.

For a band that spent a lot of time playing generic boogies and Chuck Berry tunes, plodding Western and pop dirges, and traditional folk songs, the Grateful Dead gets huge play for being out at the edge of the musical cosmos when they jam or create more original material.

I wonder if some of this does not simply reflect listeners’ previous unfamiliarity with those other genres.

Indeed, I think the “mislabeling” of the Dead, that I alluded to in an earlier post, as “acid rock” or psychedelic music leads to or enhances this tendency to aggrandize just how revolutionary the Dead’s music was at the time.

Everyone knows some old dude (hopefully that’s not me) who got turned on the the Dead when they realized that the Dead was playing songs their own grandfather used to play.  There’s not a huge amount of music played in a Dead concert that a folkie or bluegrass fan couldn’t stand to listen to.

If anything, when I was a younger whippersnapper, it was the Grateful Dead’s relatively flaccid and laconic boogies and Berrys, not to mention the heavy focus on historically-laden and musically astringent traditionals, that turned me off a little.

I suppose a tag-line such as “The Grateful Dead, making Grandpappy’s music cool again for you Hippies” would not have worked very well.  But it’s not all that far from the truth.

My thoughts on this matter have been stoked by listening to Peggy-O, a traditional Scottish folk song covered by the Dead.  The melody is heart-wrenching and may even exceed the sentiment generated by the lyrics (although there is a death, even a cursory scan of the lyrics reveals some venality and self-interest on the parts of all parties involved, thereby dampening the sympathy the listener might have).

Jerry Garcia, like many able guitarists, can embroider a melody line and multiply its beauty.  As you would expect, many live versions of Peggy-O soar with lovely solos, and emotive singing from Jerry.

As a capable musician who selected the obscure song, perhaps to popularize it, it is not surprising that Garcia saw qualities in it which would make for an affecting performance.  That his renditions can bring a tear to your eye, as you imagine the exploits of marauding sea captains and their manipulations of the local lasses, should not be either surprising nor constitute conclusive proof that Jerry knew he would die young in 1995.

That’s where I draw the line on becoming captive to the fan’s catechism.

But I have reached the point where I don’t hit skip when Playing comes on, nor do I fast-forward through El Paso.  I have come to appreciate the depth of Bobby’s philosophy in PITB (or I am trying hard to find it), and I enjoy what I infer is some campiness and smirk in Weir’s reciting the stilted words to El Paso.  Then I wait for the jams, and enjoy the drone if nothing else arises to capture my fancy.

I’ll assume I’m in good company.  That is, until the day I see a web site devoted to ranking the PITB jams . . . .

Archives

Blog Stats

  • 6,024 hits

Category Cloud