You are currently browsing the tag archive for the '[Sociology of the Dead]' tag.

A driving vacation provides a lot of chance to either listen to the Dead, or not.  In my case, not wanting to fray tempers, I am being democratic with the music selection.  So, not much Grateful Dead.

I DID have a nice moment on the Mass Turnpike yesterday when I passed a van pulling a trailer festooned with GD stickers and sayings.  In the past, I might have been tempted to say “look at that whack-job”, but instead, I smiled and gave a thumbs-up to my fellow traveler!

Made my day!

I haven’t actually thought about it too much but I can’t think of a rock band more associated with having significant numbers of female fans than The Grateful Dead.

Twirlers spinning to the music.  Blowing bubbles.  Granny glasses.  Sundresses.

The fairer sex always seemed to me to be well-represented in media images of the Dead, which were always concert shots — if not parking lot “scene” pictures.

So where are all the tortured love songs?

Sure, there are a paltry few songs named after women, with Stella (Blue), Bertha (Bertha!), Rosemary and (Ramble on) Rose in their titles, but all in all, pickings for the lovelorn are pretty slim.

In my early meanderings through the songbook, Scarlet Begonias stands out to my ears as the tune most obviously and enjoyably consumed as being about a woman.

She had rings on her fingers and
bells on her shoes,
And I knew without askin’ she was
into the blues
Scarlet begonias
tucked into her curls
I knew right away
she was not like other girls–
other girls

begonias

I came across a statement from lyricist Robert Hunter that confessed his interest in layering multiple meanings into his songs.  Decades after the fact he identified his wife as the subject of the tune.

But I’m not buying it (sorry Mrs. Hunter).

Well there ain’t nothin’ wrong
with the way she moves
Or scarlet begonias or a
touch of the blues
And there’s nothing wrong with
the love that’s in her eye
I had to learn the hard way
to let her pass by–
let her pass by

My curiosity piqued, I went looking for a picture of the poppy flower.  Poppies are yellow, right?

poppies

As Mick and Keith sang, “and I won’t forget to put roses on your grave.” (from Dead Flowers)

One of the detriments of reading so much interesting writing about the Grateful Dead (and the fan experience in particular) available online is that it accelerates the development of and maybe even pollutes the purity of my own thoughts as I experience this trip into the music.

I am not a neophyte as far as rock music, fandom or even Internet writing/community go, so while I may be relatively fresh to the music of the Dead, I am not at all fresh to the patterns that have evolved around how popular music works its way into society.

At my dedicated observer’s post, it is my duty to try to record thoughts that might have fleetingly passed through more experienced folks’ minds long ago.  I fully expect most readers who have already been there to think “ah, yes, I remember thinking that way for all of ten minutes, a long, long time ago.”

One salient observation, I hope, is that I am already feeling an internal censorious voice warning me to avoid blundering into giving offense to the fan base.  I didn’t feel it earlier, when I was clearly in that taking off the wrapping paper and opening the box mode, becuase I knew I would be forgiven.

Now that I’m into it a bit, however, certain sensibilities have crept into my thinking and I am worried about violating the social norms of Grateful Dead observation and critique.

Please note — it’s not a result of any unkind comment or response from a reader, although I am sure those will someday come (if they didn’t I’d be disappointed with my lack of trenchant observations).

Simply put, I sometimes wonder whether folks writing about the Dead have completely foresworn their involvement with other music such that they think the Dead invented everything they are doing.

My favorite example might be references to Playing in the Band, aka Playing, Playin’, or PITB.

A reader unfamiliar with the GD might read something and think that Playing will just knock their socks off.  The references to the song, and the almost always accompanying jam therein, are rendered in a shorthand that lend huge weight and import to the song.

A newbie listening to nearly any version of PITB would hear a singer, Mr. Weir, laconically and somewhat disinterestedly (and sometimes a little off-key) , talk-singing through some pretty pedestrian insights about what it means to be part of a collective enterprise (like playing in a band, or life in general).

Musically, it would be hard to describe accurately, other than to say it’s pretty melodically uninteresting, although I did come across a reference to Creedence perhaps liking the beat (I think it’s the opposite, that Creedence would do a pretty nice job upgrading it into something more memorable).

The song is more of a vehicle for setting a mood of modest introspection, and for some improvisation (funny, but the improvisation on PITB strikes me as quite formulaic as far as Dead improvisation goes).

As an outsider, one might look at Playing and say it’s a pretty big chunk of time to spend going nowhere in particular.  Dare I say filler?

But filler is not a concept that seems to exist in Grateful Dead fandom.  It seems to go against the creed to even presume that every note is not dealt by the gods themselves, on a path seeking the ultimate transcendence, if not ultimately achieving it in all cases.

The Dead have written songs of exquisite beauty and originality, and have unearthed and popularized American traditionals of equal import.  Surely they know (knew) that some of their repertoire was not to that level.

I have come to think that the choice of droning tunes, extended by jams, is a conscious one.  At some point, the uninteresting becomes interesting, the boring becomes fascinating, it reduces the scale of what it takes to create an interesting counterpoint.  The less you are doing musically the less you need to do to create an exciting moment.

I feel the same way about El Paso, a tune that Weir seems to race through with a combination of compulsive love and complete boredom.

The El Paso jams are way more interesting than the Marty Robbins song itself, a way station to get past before the fun begins.  Fun being a relative term.  Although you will see El Paso on a lot of set lists, impassioned analyses of the jams are a little more rare.

Other bands — remember those — have their own standard tunes that they play most of their shows in a given era, and you don’t see reverence for those particular live performances among their fans.

The Rolling Stones might have played Rocks Off and Bitch every night of their 1972 U.S. tour, but the avid tape collectors aren’t discussing any of those particular performances.  The songs were played to represent major album tracks from recent LPs, but were not intended to, nor were they played, in a way to do more than merely mark time in the show.

So, we have one observation regarding the Dead here — that there is frequently seen a reverence for every note that simply does not pertain to other bands.

When reading online commentary, it can sometimes appear that the Dead invented everything for the first time.  Coming into this late, as I am, I have already had exposure to free form jazz, bebop, post-bop etc.  The idea of the musicians playing off each others’ ideas is not very revolutionary, and it doesn’t need much pointing out that the jazz guys were doing that way before the GD came along.

I’m not saying that other major rock bands incorporated as much jamming as did the Dead, but I do think they band gets too much credit for playing a nice jam.

I have had the pleasure of speaking to musicians who regularly improvise, some who have improvised at, let’s say, a very high level, given who they played as a part of, and very few consider the gift of transcendent improvisation to be one of conscious thought as much as being the result of good musical chops and doing what the fingers are practiced to do.

Truth be told, an unspeakably sad guitar solo for the ages in a song about sadness may have nothing to do with sadness in the mind of the guitarist.  He may be thinking of the post-gig sandwich while playing the in-scale notes that are available to him from the part of the fretboard his hand happens to be sitting at.  (At least that’s what I have been told.  That kind of ruins it for me).

To be clear, a good jam is a good jam, and a great one may be great.  But it’s not a miracle.  And it’s not even that unlikely if you played 3000 3-hour shows, that’s 9000 hours of music to make some noteworthy things happen.

And even when things are good, it needs to be recognized that there are lots of bands that have rocked, rolled, inspired, educated, and moved us over the years.  So much of the fan’s view is a function of the definition established by the band-fan relationship.

Patti Smith, say, expands the rock and punk idioms into that of the beat poet.  Her fans have their minds blown by being exposed to poetry and art in that context of rock music.  I daresay that there are fewer poetry fans getting their minds blown by the rock music accompanying her poetic instincts.  She’s moving people largely in one direction.

Implied in that is that in my example, Patti Smith fans are probably not experts in poetry when they first get started.  The poetry they hear from Smith garners the benefit of their excitement for the new medium (poetry) in general, rather than because it is necessarily the most outstanding or notable poetry.

For a band that spent a lot of time playing generic boogies and Chuck Berry tunes, plodding Western and pop dirges, and traditional folk songs, the Grateful Dead gets huge play for being out at the edge of the musical cosmos when they jam or create more original material.

I wonder if some of this does not simply reflect listeners’ previous unfamiliarity with those other genres.

Indeed, I think the “mislabeling” of the Dead, that I alluded to in an earlier post, as “acid rock” or psychedelic music leads to or enhances this tendency to aggrandize just how revolutionary the Dead’s music was at the time.

Everyone knows some old dude (hopefully that’s not me) who got turned on the the Dead when they realized that the Dead was playing songs their own grandfather used to play.  There’s not a huge amount of music played in a Dead concert that a folkie or bluegrass fan couldn’t stand to listen to.

If anything, when I was a younger whippersnapper, it was the Grateful Dead’s relatively flaccid and laconic boogies and Berrys, not to mention the heavy focus on historically-laden and musically astringent traditionals, that turned me off a little.

I suppose a tag-line such as “The Grateful Dead, making Grandpappy’s music cool again for you Hippies” would not have worked very well.  But it’s not all that far from the truth.

My thoughts on this matter have been stoked by listening to Peggy-O, a traditional Scottish folk song covered by the Dead.  The melody is heart-wrenching and may even exceed the sentiment generated by the lyrics (although there is a death, even a cursory scan of the lyrics reveals some venality and self-interest on the parts of all parties involved, thereby dampening the sympathy the listener might have).

Jerry Garcia, like many able guitarists, can embroider a melody line and multiply its beauty.  As you would expect, many live versions of Peggy-O soar with lovely solos, and emotive singing from Jerry.

As a capable musician who selected the obscure song, perhaps to popularize it, it is not surprising that Garcia saw qualities in it which would make for an affecting performance.  That his renditions can bring a tear to your eye, as you imagine the exploits of marauding sea captains and their manipulations of the local lasses, should not be either surprising nor constitute conclusive proof that Jerry knew he would die young in 1995.

That’s where I draw the line on becoming captive to the fan’s catechism.

But I have reached the point where I don’t hit skip when Playing comes on, nor do I fast-forward through El Paso.  I have come to appreciate the depth of Bobby’s philosophy in PITB (or I am trying hard to find it), and I enjoy what I infer is some campiness and smirk in Weir’s reciting the stilted words to El Paso.  Then I wait for the jams, and enjoy the drone if nothing else arises to capture my fancy.

I’ll assume I’m in good company.  That is, until the day I see a web site devoted to ranking the PITB jams . . . .

I admit that I probably, unusually perhaps for a dedicated blues-rock fan, picked up a lot of the middle-brow vibes on the Dead over the years.

You know, the kind of jokes where Johnny Carson only had to say “The Grateful Dead” as a punchline and the crowd, and especially Ed McMahon, roared on cue.

California as the “land of fruits and nuts,” all that stuff.  More often than not, the wariness and anxiety that the half of the country east of the Mississippi felt towards California — the harbinger of trends eventually heading to the Atlantic seaboard — could be channeled through a reference to Jerry Garcia and The Grateful Dead.

The name of the band alone struck fear in middle America.  I wouldn’t be surprised if people mixed up the heavily bearded pictures and video of Jerry walking amongst the hippie fans with the terrifying news images of Charles Manson and his “family” from the late 60s.

I remember terms like “acid rock” and “psychedelia” being thrown around as examples of the extremes of youth culture.  And the number one exemplar of those genres was said to be the Dead.  Those guys who were Grateful about being Dead (how disrespectful!)  As I thought about it more, the popular characterization didn’t jibe at all with the acoustic-sounding folky, country and jug band-sounding tunes like U.S. Blues I recalled from my high school days in D’s car.

In retrospect, from a musical standpoint, with my present limited but quickly expanding knowledge of the band’s catalog, it is clear to me that the Grateful Dead did more to revive understanding and awareness of “cosmic American music” (phraseology credit to Gram Parsons, no?) than anyone.  Alt-Country as a modern genre would have been impossible without the Dead.  And Alan Lomax (who chronicled the great bluesmen mid-century for the Smithsonian, I think) could not have done more to preserve these forms of American popular music than did the Dead.

What a disconnect with public understanding.

But I have to think the Grateful Dead wanted to be hip to their generation, and they were happy for their revival of the music of their fans’ grandparents to be seen as somehow radical and rebellious.

I guess in a few years my grandkids will be listening to Sinatra lookalikes and plotting revolution with cigarettes and martinis in hand.

But I digress again.

So it was then as a fully-formed adult with a couple of deacdes in the workforce under my belt that I finally began to answer the stirrings of my calling to learn more about the Grateful Dead.

You know I hung with the wrong people when I recount that I had little to no exposure to the music of the Grateful Dead in my college and grad-school years.  No roomies, hallmates or girlfriends into the Dead.  Other than the occasional entreaties to join a crowd looking to camp out for tickets or do a Dead road trip, I had little awareness of how significant the music was that they were making at those shows as they incessantly toured college campuses, including my own, nearly every year or two.

I had no sense at the time that I was missing out on anything musically significant from the Dead.  It all seemed so over already, and hey, it was the age of Reagan.  It was before any real nostalgia for the 60s would emerge.

But it was a lousy time for music.  My record collection from those years is sparse, just the releases from my dinosaur bands, those that hadn’t broken up yet.  As a side note, in the mid-80s, students were mostly too poor to own a new-fangled CD player, so we were buying cassettes rather than vinyl.  Cassettes would play in our new-fangled SONY Walkmans.

It would be after our first real paying jobs that we made the leap into CD players — and re-purchasing all of our old favorite albums again on CD at exorbitant prices.  The change to the new format and the ability to resell the same old wine over and over again probably caused the record industry to under-invest in new acts for at least a decade if not more.  But I’m getting side-tracked.

I must be honest, I did try to flirt with Dead-dom in the late 70s, through indirection and stealth.  I paid a very heavy price that served as a cosmic warning away from the black hole the Dead represented to my life of straight and narrow.

As a senior in high school, I was listening to a lot of FM radio and in those days the DJs played what they wanted, and the new releases from the major bands were still considered major events.  I remember liking the song Shakedown Street, and that there was a teen controversy over whether the Dead had “gone disco” like the Stones with Miss You and so many other major groups of the era.

I wasn’t that big on Good Lovin’, I thought The Rascals’ original version was a lot more energetic.  But I had my eye on that album.  I liked that cartoon cover too, for some reason.

So I convinced one of my younger brothers to ask for it for Christmas.  A nice benefit of being the oldest.  I didn’t have to “waste” one of my gifts on the record, when he would do my bidding for me.

I was looking forward to Christmas morning, because I knew what my big present was going to be — my long-dreamed-of Dual 1225 turntable.

In those days, kids identified things they wanted and went months and even years before getting what they wanted.  Not like so many kids today, who get everything right away.  (Danger, grumpy old man emerging.)

Anyway, on Christmas morning, there it was, my audiophile Dual 1225 turntable to replace my old cheap BSR record-changer.

And that brand new copy of my bro’s Shakedown Street to play on it!

I think we got through the LP once.  Good Lovin’, well I could get used to it.  France seemed really unexpected, a lady was singing it.  I kind of liked it but wouldn’t admit it to my brothers gathered around me.

Serengetti was pretty out-there, and Fire on the Mountain was amazing.  That lady kept singing these prissy songs, and my brothers laughed at me.  New Minglewood Blues saved my bacon a bit.

Then some of my cousins came over.  We had the stereo set up on the floor, so the Dual, with its beautiful cantilevered tonearm that gently descended to the vinyl record in a slow, stately manner no matter how fast you triggered the lever, could sit under the front of the tree.

I was sitting cross-legged on the floor playing with a Motorific race car set with my older cousins when the 4 year old, right before my eyes, grabbed the anodized aluminum tonearm of my brand-new Dual 1225 and pulled it up, bending it almost 90 degrees in half.

I was sick beyond words.  In my family, we treated our guests a certain way, and it was out of the question for me at that age to make an issue to the family upstairs about what had transpired.

In those days, again, when your $200 turntable was broken, it stayed broken and unreplaced.

I could not look at Shakedown Street again.  The LP sat there on the balanced steel platter, unplayable, with the tonearm pointing skyward.

My brother took his Shakedown Street to his room, where it sat in his milk crate of records never to be played by me again.  I never took it up to my Greg Brady-style bedroom to play it on my BSR.  It was not meant to be.  And hey, that lady was all over that album anyway, what 17 year old boy wants to listen to that?

Since this is a semi-academic exercise, I feel the need to set forth what I knew about the Grateful Dead prior to these current days.

Other than whatever top-40 exposure I had to Casey Jones and Truckin’ as a child, my only meaningful exposure to Jerry and the crew in my teen years was through my best friend, D.

D had older siblings and he raided their record collections to the extent that Workingman’s Dead and Steal Your Face, not to mention Europe ‘72, were topics of his conversation.  D and I shared a passion for another well-known band and the Dead would have been but a meaningful sidelight to him.

Driving around in D’s car in those days, I became passingly familiar with the oddly gentle music of the Dead from the early 70s.  I recall finding the Chuck Berry tunes rather weakly strummed compared to my harder-rocking bands, and I probably made some comments about that.  With time, I found myself captivated by the unusual tenor of songs like Uncle John’s Band, U.S. Blues, a song I thought was called “Don’t Murder Me”, and something I vaguely recall about William Tell.

The reputation of Deadheads and their all-encompassing involvement was apparent to me by the late-70s, and as I entered college I turned down impassioned music-loving friends who could not understand why I wouldn’t try to go see the Dead with them when they came through town.

I knew in my bones that I liked their odd music, and I feared my own obsessive tendencies, which were safely devoted to bands that were much less accessible to their fans than the Dead.

Most of all, I thought the music had great historical content, and that it would require a lot of deep probing to understand at that time of my life.  More recently I have come to learn of the roles of Robert Hunter and John Perry Barlow, and their unique contribution to writing the lyrics for the band.  It does not surprise me today that another passion of mine, the Internet, hosts resources such as the Annotated Grateful Dead Lyrics.  But I would be getting a bit ahead of myself to delve into that site too greatly at this point.  I’ve only taken a few peeks, I swear.

Archives

Blog Stats

  • 6,024 hits

Category Cloud